Leadership choice lacks discernment
Alyson Browning
Issue date: 3/9/07 Section: Forum
- Page 1 of 2 next >
|
If students at SBU are looking to our Student Government Association for examples on leadership, they may want to look elsewhere, because for the past four years at SBU, those that fill and have filled the positions on the SGA cabinet are not and have not been decided based on experience, vision or leadership.
Since I have been at SBU, the positions have been filled on the basis of popularity or out of necessity, and for that, the organization and the student body are suffering.
Is this the right way we should be deciding the leaders of the student body? Let us take a look at how other student activities determine their leadership.
Welcome Week Steering Committee members are selected through a series of interviews, which are based on heart and experience. In the beginnings of Welcome Week, the Director of Student Activities chose the first steering committee. But from there, the directors chose those who would succeed them, and then the new directors would fill out the rest of the committee with the guidance of the Director of Student Activities. The applicants for the committee must fill out an application giving their testimony of faith, a list of strengths and weaknesses and a statement of their vision for the committee and Welcome Week as a whole. Based on the application process and the personal interviews, the leaders are set apart from the rest.
A similar process selects the support staff, brothers, sisters, prayer warriors and secret servants for Welcome Week. The SGA equivalent to Welcome Week support staff is representatives. Representatives gain their spot in SGA by gaining 25 signatures on a petition, which resembles, again, a popularity contest. But really, any Joe Schmoe can get 25 signatures, so how is this process helping to set apart the true leaders? It's not.
2008 Woodie Awards

Viewing Comments 1 - 2 of 2
Molly Graham
posted 3/15/07 @ 4:14 PM CST
It sounds as though this is something personal. You have personally attacked every person involved in this organization. Why is that? I know many people within the cabinet and it is wrong to belittle and insult them. (Continued…)
Ian Paterson
posted 4/16/07 @ 1:29 PM CST
Molly
"Her time commitment as well as personal commitment is just as big as yours and to say that the cabinet won a popularity contest is not a discredit to them, it is a reflection of student involvement. (Continued…)
Post a Comment